Today's hottest deals

Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardHuananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180424
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 02 '19 at 21:55
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 191
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 730
73% 592 Pts
64-Core 856
53% 856 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.5.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Lighting 38.4
Reflection 35
Parallax 46
31% 39.8 fps
MRender 30.2
Gravity 33.9
Splatting 39.2
29% 34.5 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,504
Write 4,665
Mixed 4,524
1,022% 4,565 MB/s
4K Read 282
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 176
746% 212 MB/s
DQ Read 753
DQ Write 607
DQ Mixed 679
508% 680 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
694GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 105 105 115 105 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 102
Write 106
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 109
63% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT31GR7BFR4C 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 45.2
MC Write 43.9
MC Mixed 42.5
125% 43.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 14.4
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 61.1
66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback