ECS A55F2-M3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardECS A55F2-M3  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '19 at 17:09
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 750K-$45
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
44.2% Average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 37.3
2-Core 105
42% 68.6 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 168
20% 155 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.5.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Lighting 45.1
Reflection 48.9
Parallax 51.9
37% 48.7 fps
MRender 49.9
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 37.4
34% 42.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 41 49 52 46 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 51.5
Write 23.8
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 47.6
29% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 77%
WD 3200BEV External 320GB
20GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 17 14 17 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 24
Write 17.5
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 15.5
26% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 20%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 2TB
186GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 24.5
Write 22.8
Mixed 21
SusWrite 16.4
28% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
29.6% Poor
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 11.4
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.9
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A55F2-M3 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A55F2-M3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $171
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback