Huananzhi X79-ZD3 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardHuananzhi X79-ZD3 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '19 at 18:41
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-4610 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 72
1-Core 72.2
2-Core 142
56% 95.4 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 416
42% 340 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
Sapphire(174B E305) 2GB
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.1
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Lighting 43.1
Reflection 48
Parallax 51.4
35% 47.5 fps
MRender 50.8
Gravity 42.2
Splatting 34
34% 42.4 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000L2 128GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4L1QCXB7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1734
Write 703
Mixed 553
217% 997 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 55.2
184% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 517
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 450
330% 436 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 320%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$23
465GB free
Firmware: SM15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 108 108 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 108
Write 114
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 108
64% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.5
303% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K73DH0- 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
54.4% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 19.4
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.2
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79-ZD3 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79-ZD3 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback