Asrock H61M-VS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VS  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120910
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 06 '19 at 11:25
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$76
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 82
2-Core 157
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 221
29% 218 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Palit(1569 1187) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Lighting 32.1
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 39.3
26% 34.2 fps
MRender 43.2
Gravity 38.7
Splatting 32
30% 38 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Morebeck-v602 60GB 60GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 51 17 31 24 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.5% Poor
Read 250
Write 226
Mixed 50
SusWrite 50.8
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 24.6
4K Mixed 0.3
37% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 82.6
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 1
29% 67.9 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 53%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
240GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 38 38 38 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 102
Write 37.5
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 37.2
41% 55.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
103% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-010.A00LF 99P5474-004.A00LF 4GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.4% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 11.8
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-VS Builds (Compare 377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback