| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20181217 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 08 '19 at 05:58 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
71.7%
Very good
|
67% 117 Pts
|
65% 550 Pts
|
62% 1,004 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.1
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.3%
Average
|
45% 59.4 fps
|
40% 50.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 293 300 265 133 80 MB/s
|
104%
Outstanding
|
87% 387 MB/s
|
174% 60.3 MB/s
|
269% 361 MB/s
|
|
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$60
194GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 167 168 168 168 167 MB/s
|
97.6%
Outstanding
|
110% 149 MB/s
|
217% 1.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9965643-006.A01G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
89.6%
Excellent
|
93% 32.6 GB/s
|
77% 26.9 GB/s
|
44% 91.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 204 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 7 1700AMD $125Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 44x |
| Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $136Bench 71%, 66,470 samples | 25x |
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 24x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 20x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 17x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 17x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 100% - Outstanding | Total price: $445 |