HP ProBook 4230s

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 4230s  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1680
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '19 at 19:29
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 78.2
1-Core 46.4
2-Core 68.9
44% 64.5 Pts
4-Core 101
8-Core 118
14% 109 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
HP(103C 1680) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
1.91% Terrible
Lighting 2.17
Reflection 3.27
Parallax 1.41
2% 2.28 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 1.07
Splatting 3.74
2% 2.54 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.91%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Midasforce 240GB 240GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 907XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 373 382 364 368 370 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 335
Write 388
Mixed 326
SusWrite 365
80% 353 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 64.6
4K Mixed 19
94% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 46.1
78% 147 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
41.1% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 13.2
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 10
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 4230s Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 4230s

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $405
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback