User System

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Destroyer	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	15.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	ECT
Motherboard	ASUSTeK SABERTOOTH Z97 MARK 2
Memory	28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180418
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '19 at 05:58
Run Duration	247 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	77%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	50.6% Above average	Memory 63.1 1-Core 84.4 2-Core 165 59% 104 Pts	4-Core 208 8-Core 291 31% 249 Pts	64-Core 288 18% 288 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 3752) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2757 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	126% Outstanding	Lighting 175 Reflection 186 Parallax 186 142% 182 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 170 Splatting 122 111% 137 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB 44,528 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 593GB free (System drive) Firmware: UH4400RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 93 68 79 87 114 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	15.1% Very poor	Read 108 Write 246 Mixed 0.7 SusWrite 84 25% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 11.1 15% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 58%
Sandisk S3512G 512GB 19,948 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 477GB free Firmware: X6107000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 234 265 289 294 285 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Read 450 Write 424 Mixed 367 SusWrite 271 85% 378 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 28.7 4K Mixed 23 78% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 315 DQ Write 245 DQ Mixed 248 194% 269 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 119%
Hitachi HTS545050KTA300 500GB-$920 242 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 47GB free Firmware: BKFOC60G SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 55 55 55 55 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	32% Below average	Read 56.8 Write 58.5 Mixed 33.5 SusWrite 54.7 37% 50.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 39%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB 66,048 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 112GB free Firmware: GR2OA3E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 69 69 69 69 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	31% Below average	Read 39 Write 69.7 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 68.8 36% 50 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.3 76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 58%
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52 41,501 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 129GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 60 60 60 60 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 87.9 Write 83 Mixed 46 SusWrite 59.6 51% 69.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 53%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 1TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 861GB free Firmware: 0155 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 39 40 40 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Read 39.7 Write 20 Mixed 34 SusWrite 39.3 25% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 69%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$56 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 718GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 76 80 83 84 83 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 99.9 Write 83.7 Mixed 35 SusWrite 80.8 54% 74.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 62%
WD WD2500BEVS-22UST0 250GB 10,566 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 233GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 56 57 56 56 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Read 57.5 Write 55.2 Mixed 39 SusWrite 55.9 38% 51.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 32%
Hitachi HTS723232L9A360 320GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 219GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 73 73 73 73 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.4% Below average	Read 74.2 Write 75 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 72.6 88% 65.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 71% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 30%
ST4000LM 024-2AN17V 4TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 564GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 87 88 89 91 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.8% Below average	Read 58 Write 86.3 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 87.7 108% 75.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.5 142% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 4x8GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 19.7 56% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 9.5 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)