Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics85.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '19 at 09:55
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90% Outstanding
Memory 72.1
1-Core 147
2-Core 295
91% 171 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 841
89% 710 Pts
64-Core 1,032
64% 1,032 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 90%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Gigabyte(1458 3773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 113
Parallax 97.4
88% 106 fps
MRender 97
Gravity 99
Splatting 100
81% 98.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 293 280 252 257 246 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 488
Mixed 396
SusWrite 288
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 60.4
206% 73.1 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 348
264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 118%
Great: 124%
P3-120 120GB
77GB free
Firmware: T180910
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 440 446 444 299 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 447
Mixed 396
SusWrite 350
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 36.2
144% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 92.1
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 136
120% 174 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 93%
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
141GB free
Firmware: V8X01c55
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 387 390 394 393 371 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 434
Write 382
Mixed 350
SusWrite 386
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 36.5
136% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 176
133% 173 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$46
83GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 73 73 72 72 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 61.3
Write 53.3
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 72
42% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2133 C15 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 14
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 96.7
41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,988 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback