Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 10A8S3E700

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10A8S3E700  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '19 at 11:39
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 407
54% 404 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 605
Sapphire(174B 0605) 1GB
CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 385.69
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LF120HCHP-000L1 120GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 107 79 12 84 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
48% Average
Read 379
Write 86.2
Mixed 117
SusWrite 82.2
36% 166 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 30
4K Mixed 20.1
77% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 25.7
DQ Mixed 46.5
47% 80.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
362GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 71 71 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 38.5
Write 65.9
Mixed 37
SusWrite 71.2
39% 53.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 43%
WD Elements 1TB
900GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 33.7
Write 35.2
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 37.5
47% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB M378B5273DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 16GB
1333, 1600, 1333, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
53.2% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.5
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 18.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback