Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte AB350M-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory20.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191018
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 13 '19 at 00:11
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 75.1
1-Core 155
2-Core 305
95% 178 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 906
88% 722 Pts
64-Core 1,117
69% 1,117 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
ASRock(1849 5001) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.5% Average
Lighting 60
Reflection 65.4
Parallax 84.4
49% 69.9 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 59
Splatting 53.5
48% 59.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLB256 256GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,243
Write 1,395
Mixed 1,205
356% 1,614 MB/s
4K Read 63.3
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 87.1
307% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 968
DQ Write 1,209
DQ Mixed 1,001
779% 1,059 MB/s
Poor: 123% Great: 262%
Amd-raid CT120BX30 120GB
61GB free
Firmware: M2CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 95 73 76 76 76 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55% Above average
Read 461
Write 410
Mixed 168
SusWrite 83.8
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 21
77% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 47.1
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 73.8
87% 141 MB/s
Amd-raid Array 1 249GB
190GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 71 65 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 66.3
Write 75.9
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 73.3
52% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 150%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC M378A1K43CB2-CRC M378A5244CB0-CRC M378A1K43CB2-CRC 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.1% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 28.8
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 27.6
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 1,298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-Gaming 3-CF - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $518
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $360
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback