Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP270E4E-K04CL
Memory1.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140828
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 14 '19 at 21:14
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3120M-$100
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 71.4
1-Core 35.9
2-Core 70.8
40% 59.4 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 174
21% 160 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C708) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.15% Terrible
Lighting 2.37
Reflection 2.69
Parallax 1.66
2% 2.24 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.48
3% 3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.15%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 62 67 82 69 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
40% Average
Read 73.8
Write 87.5
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 65.7
46% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40%
Great: 58%
hp v150w 16GB
6GB free, PID 2d40
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.4 5.4 4.8 5.4 5.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
3.62% Terrible
Read 15
Write 3
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 5.2
8% 6.88 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.62%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ20UF8BDU0-GN-F Kingston ACR128X64D3S1333C9 3GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 11.6
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $128
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback