| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| System | QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds) |
| Motherboard | |
| Memory | 3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150206 |
| Uptime | 0.5 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 18 '19 at 14:52 |
| Run Duration | 171 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
|
21.7%
Poor
|
22% 38.7 Pts
|
22% 195 Pts
|
18% 287 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
14.6%
Very poor
|
15% 16 fps
|
14% 19.7 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Red Hat VirtIO 537GB
464GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 133 133 145 150 125 MB/s
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
|
28%
Poor
|
33% 11.6 GB/s
|
5% 1.8 GB/s
|
14% 296 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 606 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples | 42x |
| Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples | 20x |
| Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples | 13x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 37x |
| RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 29x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 28x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $485 |