Google Stout

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGoogle Stout  (all builds)
MotherboardGOOGLE Stout
Memory1.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190130
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 20 '19 at 07:54
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1007U
, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Memory 53.1
1-Core 16.2
2-Core 33.3
25% 34.2 Pts
4-Core 15.4
8-Core 34.5
3% 25 Pts
64-Core 34.3
2% 34.3 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Device(1AE0 C000) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4242
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
0.96% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 0.58
Parallax 0.44
1% 0.78 fps
MRender 1.19
Gravity 0.17
Splatting 1.13
1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.96%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingmax 240GB 240GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 114 141 117 118 75 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.2% Below average
Read 185
Write 159
Mixed 161
SusWrite 94.2
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 19.7
4K Mixed 13.6
50% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 19.9
DQ Write 51.4
DQ Mixed 64.2
41% 45.2 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown (0) None (0) None 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 7.3
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Stout Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Google Stout

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback