Apple MacPro6,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacPro6,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F60DEB81FF30ACF6
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150908
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 30 '16 at 23:36
Run Duration87 Seconds
Run User GHA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 100
2-Core 206
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 513
57% 447 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro D300 (FireGL V)
Apple(106B 012B) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Lighting 28.7
Reflection 27
Parallax 40.6
23% 32.1 fps
MRender 24.5
Gravity 26.7
Splatting 32.3
23% 27.8 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 24%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SAMSUNG m3 portable 3.0 500GB
299GB free, PID 6031
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
40% Average
Read 97
Write 95.3
Mixed 85.7
118% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.65
4K Mixed 0.21
65% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 40%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x394A53463531323732415A2D314739453220 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.1% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 28.1
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro6,1 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Apple MacPro6,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback