Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1497
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '19 at 21:42
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$40
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 174
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 338
45% 338 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP920 128GB-$35
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 67 64 64 50 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 299
Write 77.8
Mixed 118
SusWrite 64.8
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 22.8
84% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 24.7
DQ Write 60.3
DQ Mixed 19.2
21% 34.7 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 85%
Adata DashDrive Elite S102 Pro USB 3.0 64GB-$13
27GB free, PID 312b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 31
Write 19.3
Mixed 23
SusWrite 19.7
30% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
70% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.4
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 1,158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $64
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback