Today's hottest deals

Asrock 970A-G/3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970A-G/3.1  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime35.9 Days
Run DateNov 24 '19 at 22:52
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 138
62% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 444
42% 348 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 690 (SLI Disabled)
Nvidia(10DE 095B) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.1% Average
Lighting 61.5
Reflection 31.4
Parallax 41.7
50% 44.9 fps
MRender 43.9
Gravity 37.1
Splatting 30.3
30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0616B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 202 148 15 96 123 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 71%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 966GB
465GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 161 160 161 162 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 128
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 161
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.4% Average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 13.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A-G/3.1 Builds (Compare 359 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970A-G/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback