Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	20.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-300 APU-$120 7,672 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Memory 37.7 1-Core 12.1 2-Core 15.4 17% 21.7 Pts	4-Core 18 8-Core 20.7 2% 19.4 Pts	64-Core 24.1 2% 24.1 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 21EC) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.83% Terrible	Lighting 0.97 Reflection 1.38 Parallax 1.25 1% 1.2 fps	MRender 1.24 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.39 1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.83% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel X25-E Extreme 32GB 215 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: 045C8790 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 0 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 0 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 740 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 432 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 82 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 180444 (E2) Load-in time 255 0 0 (E3) Torque amplification count 0 0 0 (E4) Power-off retract count 0 0 0	20.3% Poor	Read 180 Write 69.6 Mixed 83.6 24% 111 MB/s	4K Read 8.21 4K Write 13.5 4K Mixed 6.33 28% 9.35 MB/s	DQ Read 10.4 DQ Write 14.6 DQ Mixed 6.82 7% 10.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 393955353436392D 80CE 4D34373142353637 4GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.4% Terrible	MC Read 2.9 MC Write 2.1 MC Mixed 3.6 8% 2.87 GB/s	SC Read 0.8 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 1 3% 1.13 GB/s	Latency 213 19% 213 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.4% Great: 13%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16