Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-HD2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170626
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateNov 28 '19 at 14:58
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 70.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 204
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 604
60% 486 Pts
64-Core 760
47% 760 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 147
Reflection 181
Parallax 181
120% 170 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 170
Splatting 119
110% 136 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 298 279 266 259 257 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 475
Mixed 384
SusWrite 285
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 50.4
173% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 350
266% 359 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
WD WD30EURX 3TB-$182
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 131 133 133 132 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 114
Write 111
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 131
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 83%
Verbatim STORE N GO 8GB
7GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4.1 3.4 4.5 4.1 4.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
4.07% Terrible
Read 15.2
Write 1.7
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 4
6% 6.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.07%
Great: 7%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 14 14 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 151
Write 46
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 14.2
60% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.7
151% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.2% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 24.7
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 21.2
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-HD2-CF Builds (Compare 201 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback