Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180321
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '19 at 10:36
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$143
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 121
2-Core 229
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 720
69% 570 Pts
64-Core 971
60% 971 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.41
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.1% Below average
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 44.9
Parallax 41.6
30% 41.3 fps
MRender 55.1
Gravity 47.7
Splatting 49.4
41% 50.8 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsun 840 EVO 250G 250GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 119 122 111 115 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 476
Mixed 348
SusWrite 153
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 53.6
183% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 239
211% 316 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Crucial MX100 128GB-$74
50GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 69 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 435
Write 72.5
Mixed 124
SusWrite 68.9
38% 175 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 4.1
49% 11.4 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 89%
Nvme WDC WDS512G1X0C- 512GB
138GB free
Firmware: B355 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 89 79 79 82 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 861
Write 104
Mixed 186
SusWrite 85.4
66% 309 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 15
83% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 603
DQ Write 9.1
DQ Mixed 21.8
87% 211 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 153%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128
686GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 30 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 92
Write 35.5
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 30.7
36% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2412 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 45.2
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 45
128% 44.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 22.6
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 62
65% 62 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 115%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,089 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $948
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback