Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 840-$150 5,147 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Memory 73 1-Core 47.1 2-Core 94.3 46% 71.5 Pts	4-Core 183 8-Core 189 25% 186 Pts	64-Core 179 11% 179 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% MSI(1462 8A91) CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	8.71% Terrible	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 29 Parallax 35.5 0% 21.5 fps	MRender 29.8 Gravity 29 Splatting 33.6 26% 30.8 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 8.71% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 253GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 188 189 173 193 180 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.2% Above average	Read 219 Write 194 Mixed 222 SusWrite 180 46% 204 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 56.8 4K Mixed 25.5 89% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 3.3 DQ Mixed 7.6 24% 58 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 129%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$86 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 81 45 85 96 107 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	55.9% Above average	Read 112 Write 79.5 Mixed 71.9 SusWrite 83.1 64% 86.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 88%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 8GB 3,421 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 007a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.8 3.7 4.2 4.7 4.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	4.35% Terrible	Read 19.1 Write 4 Mixed 2 SusWrite 4.2 7% 7.32 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.35% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GU512303EP0202 None GU512303EP0202 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NF-CG 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.7% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 11.6 30% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 9 21% 7.33 GB/s	Latency 94.5 42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon II X2 260AMDBench 42%, 5,317 samples	10x
Phenom II X6 1035TAMDBench 53%, 2,528 samples	7x
Phenom II X4 820AMDBench 50%, 1,512 samples	6x

RAM
CMD4GX3M2A1600C8 CMD4GX3M2A1600C8 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 8GBCorsairBench 30%, 22 samples	6x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 35%, 3,211 samples	3x
M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 38%, 1,085 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16