Siemens SIMATIC IPC647C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSiemens SIMATIC IPC647C  (all builds)
MotherboardSIEMENS A5E03383577
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131030
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateDec 07 '19 at 16:33
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User PAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 E 520
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
46.2% Average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 68.6
2-Core 121
52% 85.9 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 144
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro NVS 295
Nvidia(10DE 06FD) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 310.90
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.61% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 1.31
Parallax 0.28
0% 0.72 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.43
Splatting 0.87
1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.61%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 112 50 91 123 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 127
Write 134
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 101
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 88%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
13GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 3.9 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
5.97% Terrible
Read 27
Write 7
Mixed 10.3
SusWrite 4.1
13% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
20% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.97%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF25664AZ-1G6K1 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.6% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 9.4
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SIMATIC IPC647C Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Siemens SIMATIC IPC647C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 6% - Terrible Total price: $132
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback