HP ProLiant m710x Server Cartridge

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive69.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHP ProLiant m710x Server Cartridge  (all builds)
MotherboardHP ProLiant m710x Server Cartridge
Memory28.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160902
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 08 '16 at 18:27
Run Duration58 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1585L v5
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 212
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 558
59% 472 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 83%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
YP0240GWCHA 240GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPEMS0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 476
Write 240
Mixed 251
71% 322 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 19
103% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 99.9
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 38.6
54% 98.1 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
UNKNOWN NOT AVAILABLE 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (95th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
115% Outstanding
MC Read 53.6
MC Write 53.7
MC Mixed 24.6
126% 44 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 38.7
SC Mixed 22.1
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 115%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback