MSI 870S-G54 (MS-7599)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	36.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	MSI MS-7599
Motherboard	MSI 870S-G54 (MS-7599) (all builds)
Memory	6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121127
Uptime	15 Days
Run Date	Dec 13 '19 at 03:56
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	40%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	40.4% Average	Memory 58.4 1-Core 47.6 2-Core 93.3 41% 66.4 Pts	4-Core 128 8-Core 147 18% 137 Pts	64-Core 183 11% 183 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Gigabyte(1458 22F7) CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.8.1 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	36.7% Below average	Lighting 43 Reflection 54.8 Parallax 56.5 35% 51.4 fps	MRender 56.2 Gravity 43.7 Splatting 47.4 40% 49.1 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD2000JD-00HBB0 200GB 2,211 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: 08.02D08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 34 30 36 35 35 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	24% Poor	Read 51.5 Write 43.2 Mixed 28.7 SusWrite 31.8 29% 38.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 32%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$42 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 33GB free Firmware: 05.06H05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 43 44 44 43 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	30.5% Below average	Read 62.5 Write 66 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 43.4 40% 54.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 9905403-038.A00G 9905403-038.A00G 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.2% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 4.9 16% 5.5 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 2.8 9% 3.3 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 24%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 870S-G54 (MS-7599) Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 870S-G54 (MS-7599)

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	2x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	2x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	2x
GTX 580Nvidia $450Bench 23%, 15,395 samples	2x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
320 Series 120GBIntel $89Bench 40%, 9,651 samples	2x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	1x
SP600 256GBAdataBench 80%, 4,724 samples	1x

RAM
F3-12800CL9-4GBRL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL0 F3-12800CL9-2GBRL0 F3-12800CL9-2GBRL0 12GBUnknownBench 32%, 21 samples	2x
F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL0 16GBUnknownBench 34%, 166 samples	1x
KHX1600C10D3/8G 9905403-038.A00G 9905403-038.A00G 16GBKingstonBench 20%, 2 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $273

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16