Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics38.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150624
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 10 '16 at 18:25
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 73.2
2-Core 146
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 438
45% 361 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
PwrHis(1787 3001) 3GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 16.12.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Lighting 50.3
Reflection 33.8
Parallax 61.4
41% 48.5 fps
MRender 32
Gravity 49.4
Splatting 42.1
34% 41.2 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 425
Write 412
Mixed 402
92% 413 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 21.1
86% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 66.9
80% 141 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 101%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
781GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
47% Average
Read 76.9
Write 87
Mixed 82.7
62% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.29
77% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team-Elite-16 Team-Elite-16 CT51264BA160B CT51264BA160B 16GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.5% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 13.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD5 Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $490
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback