ECS H61H2-MV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.78% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardECS H61H2-MV  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '19 at 02:21
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2020-$92
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 79.6
2-Core 159
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 159
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) 1GB
CLim: 1006 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.31
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.78% Terrible
Lighting 9.77
Reflection 8.42
Parallax 10.4
8% 9.52 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 7.78
7% 9.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.78%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$49
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 218 217 224 147 59 MB/s
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.9% Above average
Read 226
Write 213
Mixed 209
SusWrite 180
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 21.2
101% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 30.4
DQ Write 89.5
DQ Mixed 24.3
29% 48.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 86%
StoreJet Transcend 320GB
3GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 25 27 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 32
Write 20
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 27
30% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown FLGF65F-D8KMB 8325 FLFF65F-C8MF9 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.3% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61H2-MV Builds (Compare 942 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H61H2-MV - $189

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $276
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback