Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '19 at 20:54
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 219
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 433
57% 428 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Asus(1043 04BE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1326 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.11.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Lighting 31.5
Reflection 32.4
Parallax 40.2
26% 34.7 fps
MRender 32
Gravity 33.4
Splatting 70.1
40% 45.2 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 103 74 100 76 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 470
Write 328
Mixed 139
SusWrite 115
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 7
36% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 39.6
DQ Write 28.5
DQ Mixed 35.6
26% 34.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 55%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
95GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 143 88 173 161 131 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.5% Poor
Read 162
Write 84.8
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 161
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 19.1
4K Mixed 10.1
41% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 14.3
DQ Write 15.7
DQ Mixed 14.3
11% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 100%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
919GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 134 94 118 90 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 138
Write 122
Mixed 20
SusWrite 115
71% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 110%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
4GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 2.2 2.3 2.4 3.6 3.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
3.67% Terrible
Read 20.6
Write 21.3
Mixed 5
SusWrite 2.8
15% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.67%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
78.9% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 28.1
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 22.6
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $359
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback