Today's hottest deals

Positivo POS-EIH61CQ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo POS-EIH61CQ  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-EIH61CQ
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130514
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 15 '22 at 21:40
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 75%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G540-$70
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
23.5% Poor
Memory 34.2
1-Core 16.8
2-Core 50.5
21% 33.8 Pts
4-Core 77.2
8-Core 70.1
10% 73.6 Pts
64-Core 42.2
3% 42.2 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 3174) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.74% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.8 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.1
1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.74%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 89 88 79 93 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 88
Write 61.9
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 85.2
53% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 59%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
3GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 2.7 1.8 2.5 3 3.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
3.74% Terrible
Read 14.4
Write 8.5
Mixed 7
SusWrite 2.6
10% 8.12 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.74%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown FLFE85F-C8KL9 0194 SH564568FH8N0QHSCR 4GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 4.7
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 4.9
10% 3.43 GB/s
Latency 231
17% 231 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POS-EIH61CQ Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-EIH61CQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback