Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Z9PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory47.9 GB free of 56 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150610
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 17 '19 at 17:50
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 191
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 760
67% 570 Pts
64-Core 1,369
85% 1,369 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.16
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.8% Poor
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 94.9
Parallax 80.7
0% 58.5 fps
MRender 88.7
Gravity 84.2
Splatting 92.3
73% 88.4 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Avago MR9361-8i 1.5TB
601GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 45 54 71 37 68 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Avago MR9361-8i 767GB
616GB free
Firmware: 4.68
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 114 90 79 65 67 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
320GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 443 431 452 442 443 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
99.5% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 457
Mixed 391
SusWrite 443
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 42.2
145% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 36.7
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 50.7
80% 143 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
470GB free
Firmware: AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 83 88 93 92 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 81.2
Write 88
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 88.8
63% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 68%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 1TB
138GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 145 141 150 149 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 108
Write 134
Mixed 45
SusWrite 146
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YK 7x8GB
7 of 8 slots used
56GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
98.2% Outstanding
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 36.8
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.7
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $321
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback