Today's hottest deals

Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory40.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateDec 18 '19 at 09:33
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$148
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 83.8
1-Core 142
2-Core 260
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 706
73% 586 Pts
64-Core 703
44% 703 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.3% Above average
Lighting 69.6
Reflection 74.8
Parallax 63.5
57% 69.3 fps
MRender 67.7
Gravity 67
Splatting 68.3
56% 67.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 81 83 81 82 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 413
Write 177
Mixed 167
SusWrite 106
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 95.4
4K Mixed 29.7
122% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 143
131% 209 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
45GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 314 313 312 302 262 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 404
Write 397
Mixed 343
SusWrite 317
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 57.6
182% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%
WD WD7500AALX-009BA0 750GB
386GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 108 107 108 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 116
Write 107
Mixed 102
SusWrite 107
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 74%
Toshiba MK5055GSX 500GB-$33
437GB free
Firmware: FG001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 68 73 74 73 74 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 75
Write 73
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 69.7
45% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3000C15-8GVKB F4-3000C16-16GVRB F4-3000C15-8GVKB F4-3000C16-16GVRB 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.2% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 21.7
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 22.2
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,640 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $840
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback