Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-1NU (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA PT10S
Memory	9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131120
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 18 '19 at 15:40
Run Duration	108 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39 33,019 User benchmarks, average bench 50% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Memory 91.2 1-Core 90.8 2-Core 176 71% 119 Pts	4-Core 238 8-Core 235 32% 236 Pts	64-Core 236 15% 236 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 63%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ct480bx5 0 480GB 896 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6C SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 157 3.5 149 76 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Read 458 Write 408 Mixed 7.3 SusWrite 114 54% 247 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.3 39% 9.43 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-078.A00LF Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 12GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	MC Read 18 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 15.7 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 17.7 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 65.5 61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-4200MIntel $39Bench 50%, 33,019 samples	14x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	11x
GeForce 710MNvidiaBench 3%, 2,241 samples	3x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	1x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	1x

RAM
HMT451S6MFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 3,182 samples	4x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	2x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	1x

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $75