HP EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 805A
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160308
Uptime6 Days
Run DateDec 19 '19 at 16:34
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 44%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A10-8750B R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G
XU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
42% Average
Memory 51.2
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 117
45% 78.1 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 202
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 197
12% 197 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 36.8
32% 35.4 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 37.3
Splatting 36.7
30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
244GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 97 84 90 88 91 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.4% Below average
Read 211
Write 29.2
Mixed 176
SusWrite 115
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 13.4
49% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 153
122% 170 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
465GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 119 118 119 120 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
67% Good
Read 115
Write 110
Mixed 68
SusWrite 118
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.4% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 13.1
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 8
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G2 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback