| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 18E4 |
| Memory | 3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20141211 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 20 '19 at 06:41 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | JPN-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.4%
Good
|
77% 135 Pts
|
37% 284 Pts
|
17% 270 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 8642) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
|
13%
Very poor
|
13% 15 fps
|
12% 14.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 240GB-$180
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LH6i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 87 83 81 87 MB/s
|
38.7%
Below average
|
33% 149 MB/s
|
72% 20.4 MB/s
|
17% 24.2 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
253GB free
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 85 88 84 82 87 MB/s
|
54.5%
Above average
|
64% 86.7 MB/s
|
156% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 Ramaxel RMR5030ME68F9F1600 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
31.3%
Below average
|
28% 9.7 GB/s
|
31% 11 GB/s
|
56% 71.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,658 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 842x |
| Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 762x |
| Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples | 750x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 1,199x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 368x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 247x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $231 |