Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X430FN_S430FN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive76.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X430FN_S430FN  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X430FN
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190528
Uptime4 Days
Run DateDec 21 '19 at 01:01
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 31%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 62.3
1-Core 43
2-Core 101
42% 68.7 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 313
31% 252 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$66
238GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 122 55 49 58 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 588
Write 682
Mixed 646
SusWrite 107
114% 506 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 26.6
100% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 390
DQ Mixed 208
198% 308 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 209%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
288GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 39 41 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 37
Write 38.2
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 40
47% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 017A 76.B305G.D500B 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.7% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 17.3
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 11.5
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X430FN_S430FN Builds (Compare 120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X430FN_S430FN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback