Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 5150 APU R3 1,478 User benchmarks, average bench 32% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	34.9% Below average	Memory 55.7 1-Core 24.5 2-Core 48.9 30% 43 Pts	4-Core 84.1 8-Core 82.3 11% 83.2 Pts	64-Core 76.1 5% 76.1 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3 11,968 User benchmarks, average bench 2% MSI(1462 7865) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.20 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	1.86% Terrible	Lighting 2.13 Reflection 4.12 Parallax 2.81 2% 3.02 fps	MRender 2.48 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 3.09 2% 2.49 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.86% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso SATA III SSD 120GB 1,366 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 0GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 407 Write 360 Mixed 242 75% 336 MB/s	4K Read 9.4 4K Write 34.1 4K Mixed 23 62% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 147 DQ Write 96.4 DQ Mixed 133 96% 125 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 88%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 919GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 28 28 27 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Read 30.9 Write 28.1 Mixed 22 SusWrite 27.3 36% 27.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMX4GX3M2B1600C9 CMX4GX3M2B1600C9 4GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 667, 667 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.5% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 6.5 17% 5.8 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 5.6 14% 4.77 GB/s	Latency 141 28% 141 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon 5350 APU R3AMDBench 34%, 3,720 samples	32x
Athlon 5150 APU R3AMDBench 32%, 1,478 samples	8x
Sempron 3850 APU R3AMDBench 30%, 515 samples	6x

RAM
CT102464BD160B.M16 CT102464BD160B.M16 16GBUnknownBench 36%, 304 samples	3x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	3x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	3x

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $76

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16