Lenovo 4223AU4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 4223AU4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160412
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateDec 21 '19 at 20:45
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 62
2-Core 133
57% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 578
54% 449 Pts
64-Core 1,478
91% 1,478 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
EVGA(3842 2968) 2GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Lighting 48.5
Reflection 46.4
Parallax 40.7
40% 45.2 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 43
Splatting 37.7
32% 39.7 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 193
Mixed 48.5
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.2
184% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18KSF51272PZ- 8x4GB
8 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.3% Very good
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 24.9
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.9
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback