Asus P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 21 '19 at 23:19
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 154
69% 112 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 232
30% 228 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Asus(1043 0473) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1046.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 1.54
Parallax 1.59
1% 1.49 fps
MRender 1.43
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.35
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3265GSX 320GB-$91
226GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GJ002J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 40 56 67 68 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 75.1
Write 71.8
Mixed 49
SusWrite 49
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 48%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
4GB free, PID 3600
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.6 7.5 7.5 7.4 7.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
5.84% Terrible
Read 20.1
Write 7.5
Mixed 8.2
SusWrite 6.8
12% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.84%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-037.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.7% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,427 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX3 PLUS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback