Today's hottest deals

Advent DT2412

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAdvent DT2412  (all builds)
MotherboardAdvent B75MA-S01 (MS-7798)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121127
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 25 '19 at 10:38
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 103
2-Core 195
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 500
47% 389 Pts
64-Core 503
31% 503 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
MSI(1462 8A90) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.66% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 5.42
Parallax 3.44
4% 4.49 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 4.67
Splatting 3.52
4% 4.35 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.66%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
722GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 95 74 127 125 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 153
Write 140
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 105
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 109%
Generic- SD/MMC 16GB
15GB free, PID 0181
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 5.2 5.2 5.3 5.2 5.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
4.6% Terrible
Read 19.2
Write 6.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 5.3
11% 9.43 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.8
38% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.6%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLA304G08-EDJ1B 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 15.9
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DT2412 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Advent DT2412

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $356
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback