Supermicro SYS-1029P-N32R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive192% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro SYS-1029P-N32R  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X11DPS-RE
Memory374.8 GB free of 384 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '19 at 18:37
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User MDV-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4210
CPU1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 175
61% 108 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 660
61% 508 Pts
64-Core 2,376
147% 2,376 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKKA256G8 256GB
228GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 006D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 265 262 279 270 269 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,383
Write 1,108
Mixed 1,000
SusWrite 305
212% 949 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 84.7
275% 97.2 MB/s
DQ Read 829
DQ Write 601
DQ Mixed 648
502% 693 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 192%
Great: 237%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 114TB
91.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 57 55 53 53 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
221% Outstanding
Read 710
Write 51.5
Mixed 102
SusWrite 54.8
167% 230 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 9.6
2,053% 12.4 MB/s
PNY USB3.0 FD 32GB
24GB free, PID 6008
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 22 24 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 26.4
Write 23.5
Mixed 5
SusWrite 23.9
25% 19.7 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
34% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6E1 12x31.9GB
12 of 24 slots used
383GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
100% Outstanding
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 52.3
MC Mixed 38.7
120% 41.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 100%
This bench: 100%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback