Asrock FM2A75M Pro4+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75M Pro4+  (all builds)
Memory21.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '19 at 22:57
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 77.2
2-Core 143
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 239
32% 238 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.9% Average
Lighting 59.3
Reflection 66.2
Parallax 88.8
48% 71.4 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 64.4
Splatting 54.9
50% 61.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 234 268 272 252 272 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 413
Write 376
Mixed 322
SusWrite 263
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 40.6
145% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 180
155% 228 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 118%
As25 480 GB 480GB
349GB free
Firmware: V8X1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 318 320 316 315 315 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.1% Very good
Read 286
Write 308
Mixed 292
SusWrite 306
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 26.5
104% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 191
147% 199 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-17000CL11-4GBXL F3-17000CL11-4GBXL Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 24GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.1% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 8.3
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 10.1
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A75M Pro4+ Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75M Pro4+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $145
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback