MSI MS-16JB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GP62MVR 7RF
MotherboardMSI MS-16JB  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170511
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 31 '19 at 17:36
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 210
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 392
53% 395 Pts
64-Core 399
25% 399 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11D5) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4166
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Lighting 63.6
Reflection 69.9
Parallax 64
52% 65.8 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 57.2
Splatting 64.9
52% 63.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-128S1G 128GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 276 275 220 286 291 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 289
Mixed 278
SusWrite 270
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 95.8
4K Mixed 48.2
169% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 189
161% 237 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
748GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 86.3
Mixed 29.8
43% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 11.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.8
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16JB Builds (Compare 1,716 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-16JB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback