To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190603
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateJan 04 '20 at 18:19
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 176
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 678
61% 514 Pts
64-Core 802
50% 802 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
MSI(1462 2441) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 17.8
16% 17.3 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 12.9
Splatting 19.1
12% 14.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-256 256GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0318A0G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 207 386 245 227 224 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 1,174
Write 857
Mixed 114
SusWrite 270
133% 603 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 12.8
86% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 77.1
115% 211 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 101%
Great: 234%
USB3.0 high speed 1TB
450GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 32 33 33 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 40
Write 31.8
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 32.7
44% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 1.1
254% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0- M393B5170GB0- M393B5170GB0- M393B1K70QB0- 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.4% Very good
MC Read 32
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 24.6
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 67.3
60% 67.3 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,651 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback