Asus A68HM-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus A68HM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160525
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 20 '16 at 15:24
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$175
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 67.5
1-Core 69.4
2-Core 118
52% 84.8 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 205
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
7.41% Terrible
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 9
Parallax 12.6
8% 10.3 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 9.47
Splatting 8.65
7% 8.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.41%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team L3 EVO SSD 120GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 433
Write 401
Mixed 427
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 9.04
101% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 16.3
60% 132 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
448GB free
Firmware: MS1O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 185
Mixed 169
132% 175 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.21
88% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 102%
Great: 103%
Intenso Ultra Line 64GB
16GB free, PID 0916
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 91
Write 40
Mixed 51.5
69% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.29
4K Write 0.32
4K Mixed 0.37
50% 2.66 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.8% Below average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 15.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 10.7
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-PLUS Builds (Compare 496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback