To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190425
Uptime10.4 Days
Run DateJan 07 '20 at 06:26
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2470 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 72.8
2-Core 135
59% 97 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 520
47% 394 Pts
64-Core 697
43% 697 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4730
Asus(1043 3001) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.0
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
4.8% Terrible
Lighting 5.67
Reflection 8
Parallax 1.97
5% 5.21 fps
MRender 5.43
Gravity 3.03
Splatting 9.22
5% 5.89 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.8%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 53 86 32 92 75 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.7% Average
Read 232
Write 189
Mixed 201
SusWrite 80.2
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 24.9
65% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 87.5
DQ Mixed 12.2
44% 100 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 94%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29
173GB free
Firmware: VT100-50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 59 60 59 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 13.7
Write 67
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 59.9
33% 45 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1G70QH0- 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
40.2% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 12.5
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback