HP ZBook Studio x360 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ZBook Studio x360 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 844F
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '20 at 17:57
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2176M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 133
2-Core 262
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 748
78% 626 Pts
64-Core 896
56% 896 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
HP(103C 8451) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1518 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 425.53
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 26.4
Reflection 25.1
Parallax 21.9
22% 24.5 fps
MRender 29.7
Gravity 23.8
Splatting 23.4
21% 25.6 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GB
387GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0NEXF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1276 1100 818 816 816 816 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,261
Write 1,326
Mixed 1,349
SusWrite 940
327% 1,469 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 96.6
4K Mixed 69.4
222% 73.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,008
DQ Write 1,173
DQ Mixed 1,040
798% 1,074 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 266%
Great: 306%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9E02] CMSX32GX4M2A2666C18 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
89.9% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 27.9
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 26.9
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook Studio x360 G5 Builds (Compare 439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP ZBook Studio x360 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback