Asus H110M-R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H110M-R  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160526
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 09 '20 at 16:44
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6300-$44
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 93.8
1-Core 121
2-Core 212
83% 142 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 336
45% 336 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Gainward(10B0 1402) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4141
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.3% Poor
Lighting 32.2
Reflection 32.1
Parallax 32.4
26% 32.2 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 30.3
Splatting 30.2
26% 32.4 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 120GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 56 58 31 41 52 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.6% Above average
Read 135
Write 258
Mixed 17
SusWrite 57.4
26% 117 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 35.2
91% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 81.7
118% 223 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 87%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
134GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 153 143 169 160 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 171
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 158
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-024.A00G Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.1% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 22.1
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 24.3
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-R Builds (Compare 3,626 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback