Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2288G 132 User benchmarks, average bench 97% CPU1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Memory 80.9 1-Core 139 2-Core 236 85% 152 Pts	4-Core 490 8-Core 901 83% 695 Pts	64-Core 1,281 79% 1,281 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZQLB960HAJR-00007 960GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 268% 831GB free (System drive) Firmware: EDA5202Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1189 1178 1190 1088 1153 1101 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	239% Outstanding	Read 1,557 Write 1,015 Mixed 990 SusWrite 1,150 264% 1,178 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 151 4K Mixed 50.2 191% 77.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,234 DQ Write 932 DQ Mixed 1,081 809% 1,082 MB/s
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 239% Great: 315%
Samsung MZQLB960HAJR-00007 960GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 268% 845GB free Firmware: EDA5202Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1276 1256 1261 1243 1223 1217 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	273% Outstanding	Read 1,970 Write 1293 Mixed 1,211 SusWrite 1,246 320% 1,430 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 160 4K Mixed 54.3 204% 82.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,306 DQ Write 1,228 DQ Mixed 1,251 944% 1,262 MB/s
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 273% Great: 315%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391A4G43MB1-CTD 4x31.8GB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	80.9% Excellent	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 33.5 MC Mixed 26.5 83% 29 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 33 SC Mixed 24.3 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 78.8 51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 109%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

CPU
Xeon E-2288GIntelBench 97%, 132 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 131%, 1,749 samples	1x

SSD
MZQLB3T8HALS-00007 4TBSamsungBench 301%, 51 samples	1x

RAM
M391A4G43MB1-CTD 4x31.8GBSamsungBench 91%, 52 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16