Today's hottest deals

Panasonic CF-C2CCEZXCM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.02GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 76% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemPanasonic CF-C2CCEZXCM  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CFC2-2
Memory4 GB free of 8.01563 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180405
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '20 at 09:37
Run Duration88 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 25%
CPU Throttled 76%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4300U
IC1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 56.8
2-Core 73.6
48% 70.6 Pts
4-Core 94.1
8-Core 95.3
13% 94.7 Pts
64-Core 91.2
6% 91.2 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Device(10F7 8338) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
1.26% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1.96
Parallax 2.09
1% 1.79 fps
MRender 2.48
Gravity 0.97
Splatting 2.48
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.26%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,452
Write 1,891
Mixed 1,816
456% 2,053 MB/s
4K Read 151
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 110
418% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 365
276% 371 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 GKH400SO51208-1600 56GB
1600, 1600, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 49152 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.9% Below average
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 11
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 10.8
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CF-C2CCEZXCM Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic CF-C2CCEZXCM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback