Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3396
Memory	25.3 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130716
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '20 at 13:28
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 106 2-Core 194 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 499 51% 410 Pts	64-Core 508 31% 508 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7670 3,465 User benchmarks, average bench 6% AMD(1002 0000) ≥ 4GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	5.95% Terrible	Lighting 7.53 Reflection 7.42 Parallax 5.84 6% 6.93 fps	MRender 7.38 Gravity 5.23 Splatting 7.61 6% 6.74 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.95% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$65 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 171 124 140 148 142 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	62.3% Good	Read 295 Write 261 Mixed 253 SusWrite 145 54% 239 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 49.4 4K Mixed 30.4 100% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 214 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 172 147% 214 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 Micron 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6P1 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 28GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.4 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 17.7 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	383x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	340x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	209x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	49x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	27x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325