Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	21.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345 10,301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Memory 89.1 1-Core 89.9 2-Core 206 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 412 8-Core 407 55% 409 Pts	64-Core 402 25% 402 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% EVGA(3842 2662) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	Lighting 25.4 Reflection 24.2 Parallax 31.6 21% 27.1 fps	MRender 33.9 Gravity 30.4 Splatting 25.5 24% 29.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 21%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 895GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 128 140 165 165 157 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 173 Mixed 83 SusWrite 145 108% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965447-034.A00LF 4x4GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	88% Excellent	MC Read 32.9 MC Write 37.2 MC Mixed 31.8 97% 34 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 13.9 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 68.3 59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 88%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	240x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	220x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	94x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	73x
LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 11,477 samples	53x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	44x

RAM
HMT451R7AFR8C-RD 4x4GBHynixBench 82%, 1,002 samples	168x
9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 82%, 908 samples	146x
HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD 4x8GBHynixBench 78%, 598 samples	87x

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $373