Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.02GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Panasonic CF-53JNLHYFQ (all builds)
Motherboard	Panasonic CF53-2
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8.01563 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120517
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '20 at 17:04
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199 30,496 User benchmarks, average bench 48% IC4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Memory 82.5 1-Core 34 2-Core 80.5 44% 65.7 Pts	4-Core 187 8-Core 192 25% 190 Pts	64-Core 212 13% 212 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Device(10F7 8338) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2696 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	2.09% Terrible	Lighting 2.23 Reflection 3.04 Parallax 1.66 2% 2.31 fps	MRender 3.19 Gravity 1.33 Splatting 4.52 3% 3.02 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.09% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 127 131 91 84 46 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	37.9% Below average	Read 266 Write 366 Mixed 268 SusWrite 115 57% 254 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 8.8 4K Mixed 13.9 28% 8.73 MB/s	DQ Read 251 DQ Write 236 DQ Mixed 144 136% 210 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-YH9 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 56GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 49152 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	47.8% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 14.9 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 14.7 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 76 53% 76 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16